but all is well that ends well. it went well today. a little slow in the beginning (this stuff is a tad dry), but the kids really got into the notion of being proactive, and they were even into the marble metaphor of time management (habit 3: first things first; see through the lens of importance over urgency).
this could be the beginning of something big. or I could retire. it's even money right now after the stress I put myself through.
cogent thought at
20:36 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
fish my five-year-old son caught a sunfish this weekend. I caught two, along with a 1-lb. bass (we released them all). I had no idea he had the fishing bug before saturday: he spent the entire day either on the dock or in our friend's boat, rod and reel firmly in hand. now if I could only get him to cut his own worms . . .
cogent thought at
09:33 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
thursday, may 23
responsibility I think peznoreos is on to something here. parents should recognize their inherent responsibility to raise their children. they should be valued more than a radish. or a pet, even. but should it end there?
if we follow the argument that some people should not be allowed to procreate without some serious indoctrination on their subsequent responsibilities and associated loss of rights to privileges of non-parents -- a concept I find most appealing, not unlike mandatory driver's ed with an accountability mechanism that has some serious teeth to it -- perhaps we should also conclude that some of those same people should be made to understand the risks of conceiving.
why don't we spend more time teaching kids -- and, almost more important, irresponsible adults -- that we reap the wild oats we sow? why should it take an unwanted pregnancy to cause a couple to realize they really didn't want to be responsible for children in the first place? why isn't bill bradley's mantra "safe, legal and rare" taught or mandated? forgetting where this could end, we would do well to pursue the argument to its its logical origin: for every action, there is an equal and opposite consequence.
cogent thought at
13:42 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
when asked recently where I stand on johnny martinez's execution. I certainly would like to think if he had murdered one of my children, I would forgive him in much the same way the victim's mother, lana norris, did. hers is a model of Christian love and forgiveness; our children are a gift from God, and therefore not our own. she responded with grace and dignity and love for her fellow mortal, flawed human being, just as Jesus responded to us. we could do no less.
but does his apparent repentence justify clemency from death row? I'm not sure how this case is any different from karla faye tucker's.
do you have strong feelings on the death penalty? I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts.
cogent thought at
10:15 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
søren kierkegaard wrote, "the main trouble with Christians these days is that no one is killing them." it was satire then; it won't be the next time.
nfl great cris carter's career is suddenly a cautionary tale on reaping what you sow. casual fans of the sport will recognize the sad tale, if not the specifics: better dealing is a big no-no, and cris got the business end of the shaft for his opportunism. never, ever stand up the one who brung ya to the dance.
in keeping with the theme: well done, pastor. now that she's not going to re-enroll her daughter in the school next year and has left the church, care to review what you gained by kicking her out in the first place?
I am officially boycotting maureen dowd. though my brand of caustic wit, she is just.not.rational. you need some recreational therapy, maureen, in the way most bloggers need a life.
yes, damian, I would watch. now get a new webpage template. you too, dave.
cogent thought at
14:18 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
cogent thought at
15:42 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
friday, may 17
the vicious cycle captain napalm neatly sums up the problem with our educational system today: we're so afraid of addressing root cause issues for what they are that we become consumed with fighting the symptoms. or as was elegantly stated elsewhere, we feed on our addictions until they, in turn, feed on and ultimately kill us. Jesus said, "by your fruit you shall know them." that pertains to all of my ilk who proudly profess their Jesus-freakdom on their t-shirts, as well as those who insist on fighting immorality with humanistic rationale. conflict only intensifies when we entrench ourselves in our perceptions. consequently, in their zeal, zero-tolerance folks end up straining at a gnat by not asking what causes kids to misbehave, or why zero tolerance is even necessary. to draw on a common theme of late, it is a highly reactive answer to a much more imporant question.
let's break the abstract down into obscure metaphor: addressing the symptom and not the problem is putting a bucket under a leaky roof instead of repairing the leak. more times than not I am inclined to chastise myself for the words that come out of my mouth; feeling chagrined for my verbal faux pas, I vow not to speak words in haste, instead of vowing to replace them with words of encouragement. where I fail is to change the pattern. in covey-speak, to rescript myself. to become a transition figure. to be proactive in my speech by thinking positive thoughts; to dwell on positive influences and thought patterns rather than negative ones.
because our words are expressions of our heart attitudes, we should always be looking to address the heart issues -- what comes in at the root -- but remain vigilantly aware of the potential negative influence of our words and actions -- what comes out as fruit -- lest we find ourselves forever chasing our tail. each story has a common thread in that the respective school officials (and, to a similar extent, the parents) were mind-numbingly efficient in rooting out symptoms of much deeper ills. as thoreau said, 'for every thousand hacking at the leaves of evil, there is one striking at the root.' in each case, the tail is wagging the dog.
call this phenomena the dandelion effect: for every one bad habit lopped off in a person's life, without regard to the source of the problem, there are a legion of others clamoring to take its place. tell me to shut up and the evil bound up in my heart will make itself known in ways more pervasive than my speech.
one wonders ... should this be the official outfit of the pray naked experience? (note: the pray naked experience does not support nudist groups or any individual group, per se. your mileage may vary.)
cogent thought at
12:44 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
thursday, may 16
drive-by's here's hoping no one approves of such measures. the cynical among us might wonder if there won't be copycat crimes. the truest of cynics might wonder if there won't be public support for copycat attempts.
come the fall, it is likely that all my kids will be attending an assemblies of God-based Christian school. I like to tweak the locals by saying I'm not keen on them knowing the f-word in kindegarten, like some of the neighbor kids. but the truth is, I am neither willing to subject them to someone else's indoctrination that they are not prepared to assimilate into their thinking process, nor willing to refute it on a daily basis at the dinner table. providing them with a safe, nurturing environment is more paramount to me at this stage of their lives than the fullest range of diversity of thought that the poughkeepsie city school district has to offer.
that said, the school in particular has a pretty good quality of service standard. they take kids in who do not profess to having a relationship with Jesus Christ, but they do have a serious code of ethics for attending. they don't take all applicants, but if there are special circumstances (not read, special needs), they are accomodating. last I knew, they didn't ask what my occupation was, though I suppose I didn't care that they knew. I didn't ever expect they would question my means for paying for tuition.
but this just strikes me as ludicrous. first off, how did they ever find out the mother was a stripper? and more to the point, how do they have a right to tell parents what occupations are disallowed for parents of students? how is that their right to dictate? and what does it say about their concern for the spiritual welfare of the mother or her child? (especially when she is quoted as stating the job was taken on to help defray the cost of tuition!) granted, I would agree that she should not teach sunday school at the church while employed in such a manner; but I am quite on the fence about her not being allowed to even attend.
then again, I'm not affiliated with the assemblies of God.
cogent thought at
16:42 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
how can one not grieve over such a story as this, wherein the victim feels there was nothing left to live for? what makes a person so desperate that the final exit seems the only alternative? I am equal parts emotional basketcase and extreme cynic at times like these.
other cases in point that leave me deeply divided ... at my elder's meeting last night, we discussed how the church might assist three different families in time of crisis: one unwed teenage couple, now pregnant, intent on carrying to term and keeping the baby, but not marrying; one man on the "deadbeat dad" roll who lost his job, can't afford the alimony payments and wound up in jail; and a family of five, celebrating their 3-year-old's return home from open heart surgery, left homeless by a fire.
most people I know find an extreme alternative easiest to comprehend when under extreme duress. I'm sure I've contemplated my own final exit from time to time; I'm sure it's a natural thing. I'm also sure we don't, in most circumstances -- extreme or otherwise -- consider all the alternatives. feeling like life has pushed us into a corner, we are left with but one choice. "don't you see? there's no way out!"
I find the "logical" alternative to be a knee-jerk response. like gun control, abortion and euthanasia, suicide is the ultimate reactive action. it is the height of selfishness. it is inconsiderate to the ultimate nth degree. and I grieve for those who feel they are left with no other options. but I believe God grieves the most. especially when His alternative, while no less extreme, is always available for the asking.
cogent thought at
11:02 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
this just seems to, uh, fit the referral sourceswe've been getting lately. that said, what the heck do these pastors expect of 'ungodly' folks?!? quoth one unnamed pastor, "it's like what you see on tv." um, duh?
not saying I endorse the topless club's methods of attracting their constituents to the golf course. not saying I'm down on the pastors in the article for being upset. especially when the course is apparently in the line of sight of a local school. I appreciate the human form as much as any male, but I would neither want the temptation foisted on me, nor on my children.
just saying ... consider the times in which we live, dear pastor/friend. why do we expect the morals of those who have none/less than us/a serious difference of opinion to be equal to our own? once upon a time it may have been universally considered in bad taste; dude, ozzy frickin' osbourne is popular again. is there more to say? I thinketh not, he said condescendingly.
simple pleasures in onefellswoop, and by total happenstance, I found three sites with current rants about star wars, lord of the rings and spider man. I had such disappointing (multiple) viewings of the two former that I now have zero expectations about the latter. which is why pearl harbor didn't suck for me: I went in anticipating it would suck big time.
cogent thought at
15:29 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
"Let mental culture go on advancing, let the natural sciences progress in ever greater extent and depth, and the human mind widen itself as much as it desires; beyond the elevation and moral culture of Christianity, as it shines forth in the gospels, it will not go."
cogent thought at
19:18 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
cogent thought at
11:33 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
friday, may 10
random bits it appears brett was on a serious procrastination kick. and good thing too, 'cause I was just wondering what his favorite movies of all-time are. turns out we intersect on, maybe, three of them. there is just no reconciling the analytical (heavy on the anal) mind and the minimalist creative one. think I'll rent ocean's eleven tonight.
note to self: nigel has an awe-inspiring eye. I must update the site with some of his submitted work. to do tonight.
I tried to come up with a good dig on the stones' new tour. best I can do is to quote imus: "You can't be 60 years old and writhing around in a pair of leather pants talking about how you can't get no satisfaction. You can't get an erection."
cogent thought at
13:10 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
soapbox I'm really not a political animal. honest. I do have strong feelings about the political process, and they seem pretty closely aligned with these, but I find the debates tiresome. like those who believe in God, but not religion: I'm politically agnostic. I believe government can do good things, and that its true purpose is to serve the constituency, but at the national level, it has become such a sham. at the state level, people are more enamored with the sound of their own voice. and at the local level, there are many, many well-meaning folks who inevitably find themselves caught up in the rhetoric. that said, I am a strong supporter of my city councilman and county legistlator, both of whom I have either met or spoken to at length on the phone. mr.'s volkman and pizzuto still give me hope in the process.
and yet, I believe our collective reliance on government inevitably empowers the machine more than the worker bees. to assume legislation will cure our societal ills strikes me as misguided. as a HUGE supporter of martin luther king, jr., I recognize the critical role government played in giving credibility to the civil rights movement. I also recognize that had government acted properly after the civil war, there may have been no need for the civil rights movements of the 1960's.
do you know who dr. king appealed to for support when rosa parks was arrested? do you know who was galvanized into action? the church.
cogent thought at
10:33 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
someone was just referred to the site by google. dude, come back! I'll tell you why prayer is good.
liberals beware: annie may yet get her gun. why is this significant? because it has been somewhere in the neighborhood of eight years since private handgun owners have been able to breathe a sigh of relief that the federal government isn't on the way to confiscate their weapons and incarcerate them. or worse. why do I care about gun control? in seven habit speak, because it is the most reactive philosophy of government rule I know. it does nothing to address the root cause issues, it marginalizes responsible, legal gun owners (at best) or vilifies them (at worst) and brands them enemies of all that is good and holy by people, from my own experience, who know not what a gun is for. there are an estimated 65 million legal gun owners in the united states. the ratio of legal to illegal owners, and responsible to irresponsible, is staggeringly in favor of the former. seems to me that for the past eight years the needs of the very few have outweighed the needs of the very, very many. (for marya)
cogent thought at
13:54 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
debrief took two days off to become certified. that makes me for hire. also have returned from a temporary assignment to another group and am back in my old haunts. life is good.
kylie update: marya reminded me that kylie has been around at least as long as madonna. I forgot. the point, which was probably lost in the midst of the timeline controversy, is that I fail to grok the necessity for provocation. either your work stands on its own merit or it doesn't. I recognize the irony of deriving perverse pleasure from divulging my website name to fellow conservative Christians. but if you could only see their faces . . .
while I was away I resurrected a couple sections of the original experience site. the updates aren't finished yet, but there is stuff to behold. first stop is unguarded moments, wherein fellow readers are welcome to share their own angst. the one essay I have updated for the new site template is from timothy, a good friend with no good reason for having so many dogs.
also revamped is a different kind of light, wherein readers are encouraged to share their interpretation of praying naked. (it is true, I may make more out of the zenlike nature of praying naked than is reasonable.) catherine sets a very high standard with her essay "naked gardening". catherine has published some of the most memorable websites to come along; my hope is she'll re-create her virtual self once more.
thanks for waiting, and happy reading.
cogent thought at
09:09 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
and from the "it was bound to happen eventually" dept.: I found another site with the exact same template as the pray naked experience. oh well. at first glance he seems a fairly reasoned guy, but his satire rag seems too intent on offending for the sake of offending.
I found the pragmatic liberal through a series of site click-throughs inspired by my friend marya, who challenged my claim that I'm the most open-minded Jesus freak you know. so far I stand by it, though I found some reasoned minds in lexxicon'sathena, the angry clam, and instapundit. a further reading of angry clam shows a very serious undercurrent of conservative anger in berkeley. also a few strains of liberal anger, all of which are directed at one another. seems the makings of a good online soap, if one were inclined to follow it.
I'm not.
cogent thought at
08:29 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]
friday, may 3
survey says surveys such as the one mentioned here always give me pause: what makes a great guitar player? is it range or versatility or expertise? does style play a part? when jimi hendrix, jimmy page and eddie van halen are the top rated guitarists (all of whom I love), I just have to wonder how they determine the criteria.
cogent thought at
15:02 courtesy of Michael Ackerbauer [
]